Home | Alpha Telephone | Domain Names | Web Hosting | Get Traffic | xrEvidence | xrSoccer

United States Patent

Previous       Show 10       Next


United States Patent 3,734,081
Schaack May 22, 1973

TOOTH SENSITIVITY TESTING METHOD


Abstract

Bead-like spherical bodies of differing sizes and yieldability and heat conductivity are slidable through limited ranges, spaced from each other on a highly flexible moisture-impervious strand for selective manipulation to registry with a selected tooth area for localizing sensitivity to temperature or pressure.


Inventors: Schaack; Harding Van (Milwaukee, WI)
Appl. No.: 139420
Filed: May 3, 1971

Current U.S. Class: 433/25 ; 433/215; 433/32; 607/113
Current International Class: A61C 19/04 (20060101)
Field of Search: 128/2N,2R,2W,2S,2H,359,303.1,362,399,401 62/2,3 35/23A


References Cited

U.S. Patent Documents
206243 July 1878 Jennison
1567021 December 1925 Detlefsen et al.
2773502 December 1956 Kaslow et al.
3274995 September 1966 Eidus
Foreign Patent Documents
526,292 Jun., 1921 FR
1,258,795 Mar., 1961 FR
202,945 Dec., 1923 GB
221,673 Sep., 1924 GB
Primary Examiner: Howell; Kyle L.

Parent Case Text



This application is a continuation-in-part of my copending application Ser. No. 812,834, filed Apr. 2, 1969 now abandoned.
Claims



I claim:

1. A method of locating a sensitive tooth comprising the steps of providing a tooth tester having a flexible strand provided at spaced intervals with compressible test bodies sequentially positioning selected bodies between mating teeth and causing the teeth to bite the positioned bodies and repeating the sequence with other sets of mating teeth until the sensitive tooth is located.

2. The method of claim 1 in which the flexible strand is provided at intervals with spaced pairs of limiting means defining a pre-determined range of movement for each body, the strand being unobstructed between limiting means of respective pairs.

3. A method according to claim 1 in which the bodies include beads of differing size.

4. A method according to claim 1 in which the bodies include beads of differing yieldability.

5. A method according to claim 1 in which the bodies include spherical beads, some differing from others as to size and some differing from others as to hardness.

6. A method according to claim 5 in which the dimensions of certain of said beads vary in diameter from 0.203 to 0.018 inches.

7. A method according to claim 5 in which said beads withstand temperatures of -52.degree. to +212.degree. F.

8. The method of claim 1 plus the preliminary step of pre-heating a body before positioning the body between the mating teeth.

9. The method of claim 1 including the preliminary step of cooling one or more bodies prior to positioning the body between mating teeth.

10. The method of locating a sensitive tooth comprising stringing a strand with bodies in spaced relation with the bodies having varying compressibilities, selectively positioning the bodies between sets of mating teeth, and causing the teeth to bite on the bodies until the sensitive tooth is located.
Description



BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Existing devices for testing sensitivity usually have handles and terminal portions which are not graduated in size and whose very presence prevents the normal closing of the jaw to simulate the meshing of the teeth. For both reasons, they are difficult to use in a manner to localize sensitive areas with accuracy.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

A dentist can readily manipulate the mounting strand to bring a spherical "bead" of selected diameter and hardness or temperature into registry with a tooth or tooth portion which is suspect. Thereby the dentist can determine in much less time than has previously been required not only which tooth is sensitive but which part of the tooth should be investigated. Knots space the test bodies while leaving them free for independent movement in limited separate ranges.

Even though individual beads have movement through a selected range, the spacing is nevertheless maintained, each range being spaced from that of each other bead. Because the individual beads have very limited movement, there is an incidental advantage that if there is breakage of the strand on which the beads are mounted, it will only be possible for one bead to fall from the strand. The strands used are preferably of high tensile strength, as well as being impermeable to moisture, either a filament of synthetic resin or of stainless steel and either single or multiple strand or braid. It is also readily possible to change the temperatures of respective beads with reference to each other, the spacing permitting individual temperature adjustment by immersion in liquids at required different desired temperatures.

There is enough free length of strand between the adjacent pairs of limiting means to permit the dentist or other user to retie the strand in case it breaks. Thus it may be made of a material that could be bitten through by the patient through repeated use or by accident.

Many of the bodies will vary only in diameter, preferably being of a relatively corrosion-free metal alloy, plastic or rubber which can be heated or chilled to test temperature or selectively yieldable to different pressures, examples being plastic, copper, lead, and rubber (or varying grades of rubber). A preferred range of sizes of the spherical beads includes diameters of approximately 0.018 to 0.203 inches. The temperatures at which the beads are used may range at least up to approximately 150.degree. F. without damage to the beads. It is necessary to maintain antiseptic conditions. Selected beads are elastically deformable. For example, they may comprise rubber of varying hardness from Durometer 20 to 110 and consequently varying degrees of resilient yielding under the patient's bite.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a fragmentary plan view of a tooth-tester embodying my invention.

FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 are fragmentary details in plan showing bodies of optional materials.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The mounting strand 6 is of flexible but preferably strong material. It may be a dental floss. It may comprise a strong thread of cotton or silk or monofilament of nylon or the like, or of braided or stranded steel cable. Choice of materials is influenced by the fact that for reasons of sanitation the strand should desirably be impermeable by, and not chemically altered by, the patient's saliva or other liquids to which the device may be subject. Available are fine cables which are coated with some synthetic resin such as "Teflon" tetrafluoroethylene.

On the strand 6 are mounted any desired number and character of bead-like test bodies having characteristics calculated to meet all requirements. As examples, I have shown spherical metallic beads 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 of diameter graduated from 0.100 through 0.075 inch and 0.060 and 0.050 inch to 0.040 inch. While spherical bodies are preferred, I do not wish to be limited thereto except as hereinafter noted. Because these beads are metallic or made of materials immune to temperatures of -52.degree. to 212.degree. F. (or at least to 150.degree. F.), they may readily be heated or chilled to test sensitivity to temperature. Because they are progressively varied in size, the test may be localized quickly and accurately on a suspected area.

The test body 18 in FIG. 2 is of synthetic resin. A whole series of such plastic bodies may vary in resistance to pressure (from hard to soft). The body 20 is lead and that shown at 22 is rubber of predetermined graduated durometer number of hardness. All of these are by way of examples of bodies which, subjected to a patient's bite, will yield to a degree indicating sensitivity to intensity of pressure, i.e., pounds per square inch. It is contemplated that the hardness will vary from a soft rubber of about 20 durometer to copper of the type known commercially as "dead soft" copper.

If the dentist has all such bodies available on a single strand 6, or selected groups available on separate strands, he can test a patient's tooth sensitivity with more facility and accuracy than has heretofore been possible. The fact that the individual beads can be manipulated by the dentist through the selected range along the strand makes it possible for him to localize the point of engagement of the bead with the patient's tooth, while keeping his fingers out of the way and still maintaining a firm grip on the strand at both sides of the tooth under examination.

Thus, instead of fixing the respective bodies to specific locations, I prefer to provide for limited movement of each body between spaced pairs of knots which define ranges of movement individual to respective beads. This permits positioning the knot on each side of any bead to be well out of the range of the actual bite on the bead between the two knots. These, however, are preferably spaced from other pairs of knots to space the ranges and thereby to avoid confusion. It will be noted that these bodies are being manipulated within the patient's mouth, and therefore, out of sight. Thus the body or bead 10 is confined between knots 24 and 26 between which it has considerable range of movement. Its range is isolated from the range of movement of bead 8 between knots 28 and 30 and that of bead 12 between knots 32 and 34.

Any one size of bead found to be the right size for the mating teeth of a patient's mouth may be quickly re-cooled or re-heated or alternately heated for a test bite and then chilled for a second bite. The small size affords quick changes in temperature of the test beads.

Previous       Show 10       Next




For U.S. patent law, rules, and procedures see MPEP.

Disclaimer. Information presented on this page while believed to be reliable, is provided "as is" with no warranties of its accuracy or timeliness. For legal advice seek help of a licensed professional.